Today marks the beginning of Patron Loyalty Week at TRG Arts. We’re engaging in dialogue about developing longer, stronger patron relationships on the blog, at industry conferences, and on Twitter at #LoyaltyWeek
What, you may ask, is a
Tryer? In our firm’s decade of arts
consumer research, Tryers are the most prevalent type of patron behavior. They are households that have infrequent,
one-time, or long-ago transactions with your organization. Right now your database–like those of most arts and entertainment organizations–is likely
comprised of 90% Tryers. And most of them are patrons you’ve
allowed to lapse.
Tryers, TRG research
has found, are the least loyal, most expensive to acquire, and most difficult
to retain patrons. That most audience or
visitor bases are built on Tryers is a real threat to the sustainable future of
arts and entertainment organizations.
We’re
sounding an alarm, and purposefully so. Too many Tryers place the arts on a
crumbling foundation. It doesn’t have to
be that way.
Ten years ago we began using
Patron Migration Analysis to track and quantify how patrons begin, end, and
continue their patronage. We call the
pathways to patron loyalty, Entrances, Exits and EscalatorsTM. Two seminal
findings that are now generally accepted emerged:
- New single ticket buyers churn out at an alarmingly high rate after their first attendance. Since most patron entrances happen as an admission purchase, it became clear that single ticket buyer attrition was creating a proverbial hole in the patronage bucket. Often, organizations lose more patrons than they bring in annually, and that trend triggers institutional decline.
- Specific patronage programs – subscription, annual fund giving, membership – are escalators toward lifetime loyalty. Patrons who stick with a company over time and through continuing investment—loyalists-do so through these programs.
Loyalists
Are Made, Not Found
Intensified study over
the past five years has come through Patron Loyalty Index (PLI), an analytic tool
that we developed that ranks an organization’s entire database from top to
bottom. Cumulative PLI study showed us the three distinct, measurable patron
behavior groups, the Advocate, Buyer, TryerTM model.
Tryers:
Move Up or Out
This largest patron
population comes into organizations through a single ticket admission, the
Entrance for more than 90% of all patron newcomers. The high rate of churn and
inactivity among Tryer are primary risk factors for arts organizations
today. To turn that situation around
requires organizations to mobilize their efforts around re-engagement of Tryers,
either from first time to second or last time to now.
Buyers:
The Magic of “And”
We think of Buyers as an
analytic statement:
- Patrons do this (buy a subscription)
- And this (purchase an additional single ticket)
- And that (make a small donation).
Advocates:
Donors and Consummate Loyalists
At the top of the
loyalty pyramid is this relatively small group, less than 2% of an organization’s
patron households. They are patrons who have arrived at this most-loyal status
with frequent, consistent and current engagement. Advocates are responsible for the largest
revenue investments on a per-household basis. In 99% of cases, Advocates are
defined through philanthropic behavior. Whatever else they do, they are also
donors. And what level of philanthropy is the qualifier in most organizations for
Advocate status? It’s $1,000-$2,500. Even in large organizations, a relatively
small gift will promote a patron into this top rank of loyalists.
Getting more patrons on
the loyalty escalator and moving up is the key to sustaining arts
organizations. How? We need to put in place smart loyalty programs that can
increase the number and proportion of Buyers and Advocates.
Jill
Robinson will present The
Escalator Effect at the ArtsReach
Marketing, Development, and Ticketing Conference in New York on Saturday, March
17. Participate in the dialog on loyalty
by commenting here or on Twitter under the hashtag #LoyaltyWeek.
Thanks for this analysis. Much helpful post about arts.
ReplyDeleteSample Analysis